Re: "All random number generators eventually exhibit periodicity"?????

From: John Savard (jsavard_at_excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid)
Date: 08/04/04 

Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:03:45 GMT

On 04 Aug 2004 12:44:43 +0300, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote, in part:

>I worded my post deliberately, playing epsilontics; Mahler is (to
>my mind) the strongest indication, where its strength is epsilon,
>such that for any number delta greater than zero, epsilon<delta.

This discussion is far too technical for me.

I've heard of a mathematician named Mahlo (he worked on infinite sets) but the
only Mahler I know of is a composer.

John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Possible proof of Gabriels Theorem?
    ... >> that delta must eventually become zero, however, according to the ... No infinitesimals. ... Nothing indeed about epsilon being small. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Punctuation
    ... Michael Stemper wrote: ... zero such that proposition." ... Then, "For all epsilon greater than zero, there exists a ... delta greater than zero such that P" could be written: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Punctuation
    ... zero such that proposition." ... Michael F. Stemper ... delta greater than zero such that P" could be written: ... No, this seems to read "If all epsilon are positive, then ..." ...
    (sci.math)
  • Punctuation
    ... "For all epsilon greater than zero, there exists a delta greater than ... Would the proper punctuation be the insertion of colons: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothe
    ... continuity. ... I used the letter epsilon where the textbooks conventionally use ... delta, and delta where they use epsilon. ... since so many students omit them so often. ...
    (sci.math)