Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs
From: Gregory G Rose (ggr_at_qualcomm.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: encryption with pi"
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 21:05:54 -0700
In article <4109B348.5060200@compuserve.com>,
John A. Malley <102667.2235@compuserve.com> wrote:
>John A. Malley wrote:
>> flip wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>
>I just saw Greg Rose's response - maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree
>here. Oops.
Actually, I think I might have been the wrong tree
barker. We'll see.
Greg.
-- Greg Rose 232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C Qualcomm Australia: http://www.qualcomm.com.au "Nothing beats a tinfoil hat." -- Phil Carmody.
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: encryption with pi"
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|