Re: encryption with pi
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- In reply to: Jeff Williams: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
"Jeff Williams" <frostback@canada.com> wrote in message
news:aphOc.3553$tK5.16220@news1.mts.net...
[snip]
>
> I've never heard of anyone showing a pattern in the digits of PI (not to
> say there are no patterns). Assuming (big assumption) there is no
> discernable pattern, using a sequence of the digits of PI as a basis of
> (I hate to say it) an OTP MIGHT work.
No. Pi is a stream cipher not an OTP.
Once the other side know you are using PI they can
generate the sequence. This is the characteristic of
all PRNG. The key variable is just the start offset down
the list.
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Nightingale and Cut-and-Choose Proofs"
- In reply to: Jeff Williams: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: encryption with pi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|