Re: "All random number generators eventually exhibit periodicity"?????

From: Michael Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 07/29/04 

Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:39:33 GMT

Phil Carmody wrote:
> Michael Amling <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
>
>> Pi has, I think, been proved to be a "normal" number,
>
>
> Pretty much nothing apart from artificially contrived numbers have been
> _proved_ to be normal. Pi, alas, isn't one of those. Champernowne's the
> keyword here.
>
> Phil

   Thank you. I guess not everything we speculated about in high school
has yet been proved. Hmmmm, I see the jury's still out on Goldbach's
Conjecture, too.

--Mike Amling

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "All random number generators eventually exhibit periodicity"?????
    ... "Phil Carmody" wrote ... ... > keyword here. ... Champernowne is the classic and most-contrived case, ... there's a Bailey–Borwein–Plouffe algorithm for efficiently ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: e^(e^(e^e)) =N ?
    ... Phil Carmody a écrit: ... May I conjecture that it's to have two different conjectures: ... Herschkorn (Lundslaktare-Herschkorn?) conjecture: 'there is no positive n such that A_n=0' ... (with possible generalization to other irrational values>1 than e?) ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: e^(e^(e^e)) =N ?
    ... Phil Carmody a écrit: ... May I conjecture that it's to have two different conjectures: ... Herschkorn (Lundslaktare-Herschkorn?) conjecture: 'there is no positive n such that A_n=0' ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast