Re: One-Time Pads [was: Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers]
From: Bill Emerson (no_at_one.home)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Bill Emerson: "Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers"
- Previous message: Bill Emerson: "Re: One-Time Pads [was: Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers]"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: One-Time Pads [was: Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers]"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: One-Time Pads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 21 Jul 2004 19:45:59 GMT
In sci.crypt, Tim Smith wrote:
> On 2004-07-20, Bill Emerson <no@one.home> wrote:
>> You generate list of random numbers or strings and then encrypt a message
>> using one of those strings/numbers for each character as it comes and
>> never repeat the use of one of those strings then throw away the key.
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> Right.
>
>> Completely unbreakable (???)
>
> Under certain assumptions. First, that it is used correctly (e.g., you
> really do throw away the pad as soon as you use it). Second, that your
> random key is indeed random.
>
That random factor seems to be the problem here, all right.
>> My solution to the insecurity of the internet is to send private
>> communications in a letter hidden inside a package via parcel post.
>>
>> I just don't trust PGP or SSH or any of those other encryption schemes.
>
> PGP is orders of magnitude more secure against a determined adversary than
> letters hidden inside a package sent via parcel post.
>
> ...
Unless the packages are sent from a distant post office (relatively) to
a post office box that is relatively distant from who you are sending it
to and rented under a false name, etc...
>> You sure could fit a lot of them on a CD.
>
> Yes. Many people overestimate how rapidly the key would be used, and so
> think distributing CDs would be a nightmare, but I think they are way off.
>
> Checking my home machine, I see the following:
>
> Uptime: 7 days, 6 hours
> Traffic on eth0: received 274 Mbytes, sent 196 Mbytes
>
> For my machine at the office:
>
> Uptime: 14 days, 22 hours
> Traffic on eth0: received 376 Mbytes, sent 75 Mbytes
>
> Based on those numbers, and my guess as to how much of that traffic was
> between my home and work, if I were to use a one-time pad to encrypt traffic
> between home and work, one CD a month would easily cover it. One DVD would
> probably cover a whole year.
>
> A CD a month, or even a CD a week, would not be a distribution nightmare.
>
> --
> --Tim Smith
Good! Cleared that up.
Thanks Tim. A lot.
I have really gotten sidetracked by this otp thing, but it's a better
project than a stupid game, by far. Extremely interesting world you
have here.
Bill
- Next message: Bill Emerson: "Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers"
- Previous message: Bill Emerson: "Re: One-Time Pads [was: Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers]"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: One-Time Pads [was: Re: Help: Randomizing a List of Numbers]"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: One-Time Pads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|