Re: Surrogate factoring, reasons for my concerns

From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 07/21/04 

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:22:40 GMT

James Harris wrote:
> Oh, so you think that shows that you're not losing it?
>
> Your reply here is fascinating in what you appear to NOT see when I
> dare say few others who read your post can possibly miss it.

So now you're a mathematician, cryptographer, lawyer and psychologist? Holy
crap, you're a living breathing renaissance man. All you have now is to
master astrology, history, politics, chemistry, art, music and medicine and
we'll make chapels in your honour!

Don't stop now you're almost there!

Whatever. Keep posting your nonsense and you'll keep getting people
pointing out the folly of your ways.

Tom

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Surrogate factoring, reasons for my concerns
    ... James Harris wrote: ... so you think that shows that you're not losing it? ... > Your reply here is fascinating in what you appear to NOT see when I ... master astrology, history, politics, chemistry, art, music and medicine and ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, reasons for my concerns
    ... so you think that shows that you're not losing it? ... I've submitted things to journals before too. ... this is Usenet, and trying to control other people's posts, when you ... James Harris ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, reasons for my concerns
    ... so you think that shows that you're not losing it? ... I've submitted things to journals before too. ... this is Usenet, and trying to control other people's posts, when you ... James Harris ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Wagners brain
    ... penchant for losing his sense of surroundings completely at a moment's ... Everyone's brain works differently. ... Fascinating though:) ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-mets)
  • Re: My results, concrete and real
    ... James Harris wrote: ... > you can see a pure math result, beautiful and rather fascinating. ... Uh-oh, ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast