Re: public key crypto

From: Peter Fairbrother (zenadsl6186_at_zen.co.uk)
Date: 07/05/04 

Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 23:30:54 +0100

Peter Fairbrother wrote:
 
> *There is a bit about A and p being relatively prime which I missed out. If
> 1 < A < pq then an A cannot be relatively prime to both p and q
                                           ^
                                          un

ooops. Sorry

> simultaneously. The rest is left for the reader - there is no trick, I'm
> just too lazy to do it for free.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: public key crypto
    ... Peter Fairbrother wrote: ... > ooops. ... >> just too lazy to do it for free. ... Too much gin. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: New Territory, Derbyshire
    ... > It's Winnats, BTW. ... Ooops, just too lazy to get the map out of the car to check, still ...
    (uk.rec.walking)
  • Re: 3PH motor FOC
    ... John S wrote: ... And I'll buy you a pint or three on Saturday too! ... -- Peter Fairbrother ... OOOPS, got carried away there and thought it was something different. ...
    (uk.rec.models.engineering)
  • Re: 3PH motor FOC
    ... Mark Rand wrote: ... And I'll buy you a pint or three on Saturday too! ... -- Peter Fairbrother ... OOOPS, got carried away there and thought it was something different. ...
    (uk.rec.models.engineering)