Re: triple DES with different keys, is it 2E112 or 2E168 to break?
From: Ernst Lippe (ernstl-at-planet-dot-nl_at_ignore.this)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- In reply to: Markus Romanoff: "Re: triple DES with different keys, is it 2E112 or 2E168 to break?"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: triple DES with different keys, is it 2E112 or 2E168 to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:08:33 +0200
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:33:24 -0400, Markus Romanoff wrote:
> Would there be an appreciable increase in security if one were to create a
> triple AES (Rijndael)?? or would the same attack scenarios for triple DES
> apply?
The same attack could be used for AES, but there is no good
reason to use 3AES, because its key size is much larger.
Ernst Lippe
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- In reply to: Markus Romanoff: "Re: triple DES with different keys, is it 2E112 or 2E168 to break?"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: triple DES with different keys, is it 2E112 or 2E168 to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]