Re: Cryptogram Comment
From: Tom St Denis (tom_at_securescience.net)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- In reply to: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:00:07 GMT
Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:
> Read what I wrote, please. In the scenario I describe I am not a pirate
> and I am being harmed by the actions that you are defending.
You may be harmed but who is doing the harm? The company who *sells* a
product then supports its *customers*? Or the pirate who *steals* and then
doesn't have enough common sense to at least use a firewall/AV?
>>Any private sector company is responsible to it's customers and
>>shareholders only.
>
> You couldn't be more wrong. They are responsible to those who they
> harm and are required to take all reasonable steps to reduce that harm.
Again I don't see it as Microsoft doing the harm. I have a legit copy of
windows [which I seldom use]. I keep it up to date via their website which
works just fine. To me they did their part.
Nobody is questioning that Microsoft should patch their OS. What I am
questioning is this belief that Microsoft should support pirates as well.
Recall they're trying to make money off Windows. Why would they encourage
pirates to never license [via giving them updates]?
In fact if anything by supporting pirates they *will* make the world less
secure. Their profits will lower [well maybe not] then they will have to
hire fewer people, pay existing staff less and eventually the code quality
will be less than it's already at. Take that!
Tom
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- In reply to: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Reply: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: Cryptogram Comment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|