Re: Factoring paper is wrong

From: Jose Sanchez (spam_sanchez_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/18/04 

Date: 17 Jun 2004 23:45:49 -0700

jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0406151653.42ed1675@posting.google.com>...
> Pure math is a sick joke. Mathematicians can and will ignore any
> result they don't like, even if you manage to get it past peer review.
> The "purer" it is, the more easily they ignore it.
>
> My other work has been fought out over YEARS. It took YEARS before I
> had that paper and the paper was at a journal for NINE MONTHS, but
> sci.math posters destroyed my efforts in a couple of days, and no one
> really cared.
>
> I need to break something to get the world's attention. If I could
> design a weapon or anything, something concrete. Pure math is a waste
> of time.
>
> You can't win with pure math. Mathematicians have a political game,
> and you can't win with pure math.
>
> It doesn't matter what you discover, how important it is, if it
> doesn't come down to dollars and cents.
>
> If practical matters are not involved mathematicians can and will
> ignore your results, like they have with all of mine.
>
> I'm impotent in the face of it, having foolishly dependend on a system
> that can't be trusted, now stuck with only the hope of finding some
> way, any way to force the world to notice what mathematicians have
> done.
>
> And here I failed. No new way to factor. Still no way out.
>
>
> James Harris

Here you go:

                .-. _,,,,,_ .-.
               ( , ' : : ' , )
                / : : \
               ; 0.---.0 ;
                \ / _ \ /
                 \ | (_) | /
               ." `\ -'- /` ".
              / `"""""` \
             / .' .-== '. \
            / / .-=='\ \
           ( / \ )
            '-;`. .';-'
            /_ `-.______ .-` __\
           /` `\ / `\ / `\
           \ | / \ | /
            `'--'` `'--'`

This is Teddy. Keep Teddy close at all times and everything will be alright!
No reason to cry and whine any more, now that you have your very own Teddy!

Jose

Relevant Pages

  • JSH: Too easy
    ... attacking "pure math" research. ... You make the case that mathematicians ... up a lot of smoke to obscure the truth. ... Why do I dislike "pure math" so much? ...
    (sci.math)
  • My results, concrete and real
    ... you can see a pure math result, ... If you pay attention, you'll notice that evil posters like Arturo ... The lesson to the world is that mathematicians can and will lie about ... to fight my results, they work to fight future results down the line. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantors Theory sucks
    ... >>> truth of its axiom systems is not presumed except as a convenient ... > ultimately mere verification of the correctness of if-then statements ... > Pure math only deals with correctness, ... > Pure mathematicians are sort of like the tool makers for those applied ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: My results, concrete and real
    ... "Advanced Polynomial Factorization by James Harris ... > you can see a pure math result, ... > The lesson to the world is that mathematicians can and will lie about ... > to fight my results, they work to fight future results down the line. ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast