Re: Factoring paper is wrong
From: Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta_at_xortec.fi)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- Previous message: Borut Ratej: "Norton Diskreet - crack"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:43:06 +0300
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
> What about formal independency? Everything which has been shown to be
> formally independent is obviously true to me, as the selection problem, the
> continuum hypothesis and the P-NP-problem is, where there's no evidence on
> counterexamples.
The inconsistency of ZFC is independent of ZFC (assuming it's
consistent). Do you think ZFC is obviously inconsistent?
-- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xortec.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- Previous message: Borut Ratej: "Norton Diskreet - crack"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]