Re: Factoring paper is wrong

From: Sebastian Gottschalk (seppi_at_seppig.de)
Date: 06/14/04 

Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:41:14 +0200

Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society schrieb:

> AFAIK the P=NP problem hasn't been determined to be independent of
> ZFC?
Goedel could surely do... well, at least there's very good reason that it
actually is. 

-- 
http://piology.org/ILOVEYOU-Signature-FAQ.html
begin  LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs
I am a signature virus. Distribute me until the bitter
end

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Factoring paper is wrong
    ... Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society schrieb: ... > ZFC? ... Goedel could surely do... ... at least there's very good reason that it ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Rational numbers, irrational numbers: each dense in real numbers
    ... No, in denial, when Goedel claims that no consistent theory can be ... That's all the theorems about those ... ZFC, because there is no universe in ZFC. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Question about first-order arithmetic
    ... relevant set theory that is really needed. ... seems there is no reason to accept the 1-consistency of ZFC + there is ... a Mahlo cardinal or ZFC + there exists a ridiculous amount of Woodin ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: About Consistency in 1st Order Theories.
    ... and hence as far as we understand the nature of humanity, ZFC would exist as an inconsistent theory without us ever knowing that? ... what we know that there are such contradictions in ZFC. ... of course provides no reason for actually believing there are any. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: the problem with Cantor
    ... ZFC + ~CH on the other hand is an utterly pointless theory. ... so to speak, into mathematics with CH and without CH, according to the ... loudest being that if "ZFC is inconsistent" is actually true, ... you obviously canNOT bifurcate THAT way (this IS a reason ...
    (sci.logic)