Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea

From: James Harris (jstevh_at_msn.com)
Date: 06/14/04 

Date: 14 Jun 2004 10:24:58 -0700

mikharakiri_nospaum@yahoo.com (Mikito Harakiri) wrote in message news:<8a529bb.0406132017.6cfc875f@posting.google.com>...
> "Bartosz Zoltak" <X@vmpcfunction.com; X=bzoltak> wrote in message news:<caburi$f6c$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>...
> > James Harris wrote:
> > > Let the engineer types worry about the details.
> >
> > You prefer to concentrate on the theoretical side, that's
> > understandable. In the ideal world this should work - you devise the
> > theory and let others implement it.
> >
> > Unfortunately the world does not look to be so ideal, which is bad
> > news if you are right and which is good news if you are wrong about
> > your algorithm.
> >
> > So, regardless of how you feel about our idea and whether you like the
> > engineering part or not - if you want to impress the people and earn
> > the respect, it look like you really need to do this engineering step.
> > It may be hard for you but would bring you great benefits if you
> > succeed and *show* that your algorithm works. It's a good investment
> > of time and effort.
> >
> > While theoretical discussions may be what you more like, but it is
> > definitely the hardest and longest way you could take to earn respect.
> > It is a bad investment of time, effort and nerves, in my opinion.
> >
> > The choice is yours.
>
> Remarkable. Just 6 months ago Harris abused sci.math with his little
> java factoring program, and today he is a "theoretician" who lets
> "engineers to fill in all the details".

Yeah and I figure the damn thing probably didn't work that well. I
wonder about you people and your continual attempts to make all of
this PERSONAL as if you don't have better things to do with your life.

Like how some of you keep up with so much of what I've done in the
past.

It's freaking bizarre is what it is.

I barely remember what I was doing six months ago.

James Harris

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Washington continues propaganda barrage against Iran
    ... connected with news opinion content,. ... Either be in the opinion business (Hannity, OReilly, ... And overrun by Muslim fanatics in about a year, Comrade. ... can be pacifists and Socialists on someone else's dime. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Washington continues propaganda barrage against Iran
    ... connected with news opinion content,. ... Scarborough changed this story so many times, it doesn't know if it is ... Either be in the opinion business (Hannity, OReilly, ... Spin, spin, spin. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: The role of government should be........
    ... Issues themselves are multi-faceted, and if a media outlet chooses to report a portion of an issue as 'news' it gets that right under our Constitution, so long as it is news and does not promote an 'opinion.' ... But it does promote an 'opinion' with its selection of the 'news item' so the reader 'interprets' the direction from which the news comes, and walks away with either the 'conservative' or 'liberal' side. ... We're talking about the actual asserting of an opinion, which is the only thing that would qualify under either the Fairness Doctrine, or under the Fair and Balanced. ... But requiring media outlets who use the public airwaves to provide equal time when they voice an opinion is in keeping with the role of government to prevent curtailing of free speech by requiring that both OPINIONS be presented. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: The role of government should be........
    ... to report a portion of an issue as 'news' it gets that right ... talking about the actual asserting of an opinion, ... opinion and the fairness doctrine would not stop them. ... But requiring media outlets who use the public ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: The role of government should be........
    ... Issues themselves are multi-faceted, and if a media outlet chooses to report a portion of an issue as 'news' it gets that right under our Constitution, so long as it is news and does not promote an 'opinion.' ... But it does promote an 'opinion' with its selection of the 'news item' so the reader 'interprets' the direction from which the news comes, and walks away with either the 'conservative' or 'liberal' side. ... We're talking about the actual asserting of an opinion, which is the only thing that would qualify under either the Fairness Doctrine, or under the Fair and Balanced. ... But requiring media outlets who use the public airwaves to provide equal time when they voice an opinion is in keeping with the role of government to prevent curtailing of free speech by requiring that both OPINIONS be presented. ...
    (soc.retirement)