Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea
From: Bartosz Zoltak (X_at_vmpcfunction.com;)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:56:07 +0200
James Harris wrote:
> If mathematicians just ignore the result, however, and someone out
> there in this big world finds that the theory is correct, then they
> will be able to break into any computer system that uses the idea
that
> factoring is a hard problem.
Tom gave you a good track to follow.
As for how I see your situation - IF your theory works, I can't
undrstand why you chose the hard way - of trying to convince people -
instead of just SHOWING that you are right.
Factoring is a friendly and clear problem - either you CAN factor a
number or you only SAY you can - benefit from this clarity and break
the RSA challenge or demonstrate in any other way that your algoritm
works for really big numbers! The world will be yours then.
Bartosz
-- Bartosz Zoltak http://www.vmpcfunction.com X@vmpcfunction.com; X=bzoltak
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: New Way to Factor"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|