Re: About VMPC
From: Bartosz Zoltak (X_at_vmpcfunction.com;)
Date: 06/08/04
- Next message: Hanlon: "Hanlon's razor - was:Re: Iranian cipher: Broken or Stolen?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: key change"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: About VMPC"
- Next in thread: Giorgio: "Re: About VMPC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:16:25 +0200
Gregory G Rose wrote:
> Anyway, my understanding is the the point of the
> "+1" (or xor something, or plus something else
> non-zero) is that it appears to make it hard to go
> from knowing the permutation Q[x] back to knowing
> the original P[x]. This would not be true if it
> was simply P[P[P[x]]].
That's exactly right, thanks for the clarification!
Bartosz
- Next message: Hanlon: "Hanlon's razor - was:Re: Iranian cipher: Broken or Stolen?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: key change"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: About VMPC"
- Next in thread: Giorgio: "Re: About VMPC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading