Re: Dining Cryptographers Problem variation
From: Thomas Pornin (pornin_at_nerim.net)
Date: 05/27/04
- Next message: David Eather: "Re: http://www.cerberus-sys.com/~belleisl/infosec.html"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: MITM attacks"
- In reply to: ford: "Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Next in thread: foo: "Re: Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Reply: foo: "Re: Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:29:13 +0000 (UTC)
According to ford <ford_usa_mustang@yahoo.fr>:
> I have some questions about the Dining Cryptographers Problem.
The correct term is not "questions" but "homework". You have
homework to do.
Although I loathe such attempts at lazyness, I am more inclined to pity
than despise you, since your total lack of skill is pathetic: you did
not try to disguise your homework into genuine questions, and you did
not even include the necessary text to make your message understandable
(I refer to the "as described above", and there is no "above"). That
you made an harmless typing error ("descrbied") shows that you did not
copy&paste the text; you dutifully typed it on a keyboard, obviously
without understanding or even trying to get a grasp at what this was all
about.
--Thomas Pornin
- Next message: David Eather: "Re: http://www.cerberus-sys.com/~belleisl/infosec.html"
- Previous message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: MITM attacks"
- In reply to: ford: "Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Next in thread: foo: "Re: Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Reply: foo: "Re: Dining Cryptographers Problem variation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]