Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited
From: Gary Shannon (gary_at_fiziwig.com)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Open Request of Conference Reviewers"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Congruences: the smallest solution"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 02:27:44 GMT
"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c65f87.0405040608.6c8a311b@posting.google.com...
> "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote in message
news:<40927084.20B8A452@null.net>...
> > James Harris wrote:
> > > It's just an idea that I thought I'd toss out to see if there was any
> > > familiarity with the *approach* which is to try and shift factoring M
> > > to factoring some number off M, like M+1, by using asymmetric
> > > equations.
> >
> > It would be a nice idea if it worked, but it doesn't seem
> > to me that knowing the factors of M+1 and/or M-1 helps at
> > all in finding the factors of M.
>
> I gave a demonstration in this thread, where factoring 118 lead to a
> factorization of 119, as a proof of concept.
>
> What I'm seeing here is what I've seen before on Usenet, and in my
> experience, Usenet is a place where people who do NOT have novel ideas
> that work will go after people who do.
>
> I post ideas, and people insult me, call me names like "crank" or
> repeatedly claim that things that do work, don't.
I can't speak for anyone else, but if you will review the replies I've made
I have not called anyone any names, I've simply politely asked questions.
If you answer my questions I can ask you some more questions and then we can
have a meaningful dialog about your idea.
As for anyone who does call you names, well that kind of behavior deserves
to be ignored, so why not just ignore it and continue the dialog with those
people here who ARE interesting in hearing what you have to say?
--gary
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: Open Request of Conference Reviewers"
- Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: Congruences: the smallest solution"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|