Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness
From: Tom St Denis (tom_at_securescience.net)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: pseudo-random key generator, not bad says i"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Jacobi test algorithm."
- In reply to: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Next in thread: news.tin.it: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: news.tin.it: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:58:15 GMT
Baratt wrote:
>>Email the tech support?
>>
>>Tom
>
>
> The reply is that they don't clearly understand what I mean with
> "strenghtness". Sure, my english is not really good but I think isn't
> really hard to understand.
> But, in general:
>
> If you use a 256 bit encryption algorithm (say, AES256), should you
> use a password >= 256 bit to achieve the optimal security?
Generally yes. Though there are other reasons to use AES256. Marketing
is a good one. See big-number theorem states that a poorly designed
product + one blue button + bignumbers == profits.
Tom
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: pseudo-random key generator, not bad says i"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Jacobi test algorithm."
- In reply to: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Next in thread: news.tin.it: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: news.tin.it: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]