Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk
From: William Wallace (msm30_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: William Wallace: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: William Wallace: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Apr 2004 19:47:24 -0700
Michael Amling <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<uU5kc.186$Fk1.106@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com>...
> Thomas Pornin wrote:
>
> Not to mention the problem of whether the specification that the
> program is proven to correctly implement is in fact an accurate
> depiction of what the user wants.
>
> --Mike Amling
You're right. That is also a very real problem.
- Next message: William Wallace: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: William Wallace: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- In reply to: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]