Re: Order question
From: Michael Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 04/30/04
- Next message: jim: "Re: If you think Michael Jackson is innocent you're a giant ***"
- Previous message: An Metet : "Re: Order question"
- In reply to: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: Order question"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Order question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:24:18 GMT
Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>
> A typical DH with optimisation will have p = mq+1, and use a generator of
> the subgroup of order q. Are there any security implications to using a q of
> the usual say 160 bits size, but with small Hamming weight?
Someone else can answer this, but I would be surprised if there were,
because Hamming weight is strongly dependent on representation in base
2, but the mathematics of DH is not.
--Mike Amling
- Next message: jim: "Re: If you think Michael Jackson is innocent you're a giant ***"
- Previous message: An Metet : "Re: Order question"
- In reply to: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: Order question"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Order question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]