Re: Best definition of cryptography
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc1_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Help needed with a proof..."
- In reply to: Anton Stiglic: "Re: Best definition of cryptography"
- Next in thread: Nomen Nescio: "Re: Re: Best definition of cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:52:13 -0700
"Anton Stiglic" <stiglic@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote
> > >"The science of providing secure communication over insecure
> > > channels".
> > That's seems like a nice definition to me. Rivest has also proposed a
> > wording something like "the science of communication in the presence of
> > an adversary", which I also like.
> That's a nice one. It can nicely include stuff like zero-knowledge
proofs,
> where
> your channel might be secure, but where one of the participants ...
I think that the definition should not imply that communication is
a subset of cryptography. Usually cryptography takes some
communcations channel as a given, and then tries to make some
more secure use of it.
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Help needed with a proof..."
- In reply to: Anton Stiglic: "Re: Best definition of cryptography"
- Next in thread: Nomen Nescio: "Re: Re: Best definition of cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]