Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited
From: Michael Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Next in thread: Gary Shannon: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:29:43 GMT
Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> James Harris wrote:
>
>>>> "Gary Shannon" <gary@fiziwig.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:<6b302915d9081b50c33e6fa9f68c72e3@news.teranews.com>...
>>>>
>>>>> M = 15645595639 the integer to be factored
>>>>> T = 15645595640 ...
>>>>> T^4 = 59919531205943184213873498032430492160000 ...
>>>>> Now what's the next step?
>>>>
>>>> You factor T. ...
>
>
> Sorry, but I'm still wondering what the "j" and "k"
> are supposed to be. Is k a subscript, exponent, or
> factor?
You mean, they're not the quaternions?
>
> Also, it seems you have replaced the "factor an
> N-digit number" with "factor an N-digit number",
> which on its face doesn't seem like it helps any.
> Is there supposed to be a recursion? If so it
> doesn't seem to converge fast enough.
--Mike Amling
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Next in thread: Gary Shannon: "Re: Factorizaton idea, revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|