Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness
From: Tom St Denis (tom_at_securescience.net)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: patent status of panama,cellhash,subhash,others..."
- In reply to: Baratt: "Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Next in thread: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:54:09 GMT
Baratt wrote:
> I am using Ce-Infosys free version. I've noticed that the longest
> password is about 20 chars so his "strenghtness" is from about 26 bits
> (dictionary passphrase) to about 130 bits (random ascii string).
> Please correct me if I am wrong at anything, but:
>
> why use a 256 bit algorithm if the best usable password is less than
> 130 bits?
> does e-identity token guarantee a strongest security?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mario.
>
> P.S. I have already posted this message in alt.computer.security but
> without any reply. I hope not to have infringed the netiquette.
Email the tech support?
Tom
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Blowfish Sign Extension implementation risk"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: patent status of panama,cellhash,subhash,others..."
- In reply to: Baratt: "Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Next in thread: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Reply: Baratt: "Re: Ce-Infosys Compusec password strenghness"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]