Re: Approximating random S-box differentials
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 04/21/04
- Next message: Mark Jones: "Re: Beginner Question"
- Previous message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Sassaman remop, make your SPONSORING public"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Approximating random S-box differentials"
- Next in thread: Matthew Skala: "Re: Approximating random S-box differentials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:34:22 -0000
unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) wrote in
news:c66b2m$srn$1@string.physics.ubc.ca:
> Since "constructions"
> are defined by the parenthases as "changing or random S-boxes", both of
> you have an argument. While many people feel that grammer is irrelevant,
> and "like, you know what I mean," this is another indication that it is
> not.
>
Bill, you know I think grammar is important; so are punctuation and
spelling.
J
-- __________________________________________ When will Bush come to his senses? Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: Mark Jones: "Re: Beginner Question"
- Previous message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Sassaman remop, make your SPONSORING public"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Approximating random S-box differentials"
- Next in thread: Matthew Skala: "Re: Approximating random S-box differentials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|