Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 04/18/04
- Next message: David Holland: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Previous message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Sassaman remop, make your SPONSORING public"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Next in thread: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Reply: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC)
"Mok-Kong Shen" <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:c5rfd9$lrl$01$1@news.t-online.com...
>
[snip]
>
> The matter is somewhat different with the device I mentioned.
> If one takes the numbers as they are actually drawn by the
> lottery from a big machine sequentially one by one, the above
> value 49*48*.... is right. But my tiny device gives 6 numbers
> all at once. So it's not a permutation but a combination.
> However, the principle you indicated is certainly right. Thanks.
>
Can the device show the same number twice at the same time?
Depending on the internal design the device may have a way
of preventing the same number appearing twice.
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: David Holland: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Previous message: privacy.at Anonymous Remailer: "Sassaman remop, make your SPONSORING public"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Next in thread: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Reply: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Minimal crypto OTP by dummie"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
