Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group
From: David Sexton (da5id65536_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 04/14/04
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: ECC2 pay be over"
- In reply to: Paul Pires: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Reply: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Reply: Gregory G Rose: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Apr 2004 11:50:42 -0700
"Paul Pires" <diodude@got.net> wrote in message news:<fpXec.22232$aq1.20594@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...
> "Bartosz Zoltak" <X@vmpcfunction.com; X=bzoltak> wrote in message news:c5gimu$ahs$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> > Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> >
> > > Since this group is not moderated, anyone is principally
> > > free to post anything he likes.
> > (...)
Um, excuse me guys. I think this group IS moderated. Isn't Greg Rose
one of the moderators?
You're comments are well-taken. People don't like to be annoyed by
stupid challenges from people who won't STUDY before they post, but
it's easy enough to quickly pass on to the next thread and ignore it.
When stupid questions produce no responses, "newbies" (GOD, I hate
that silly pseudo-word!) will give up and go to Yahoo groups or
something.
David Sexton
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: ECC2 pay be over"
- In reply to: Paul Pires: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Reply: John A. Malley: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Reply: Gregory G Rose: "Re: On reducing the bandwidth of the group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|