Re: 'Scripts' & Communications
From: Peter T. Daniels (grammatim_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 04/09/04
- Next message: Simon Johnson: "Re: How secure is 2048 bit RSA?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:36:25 GMT
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:
>
> "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:
> <...>
> > So why would an 'alphabet' look much different 500 years hence?
> >
> > Few, if any, of the scripts currently in use show signs of being
> > abandoned by their users.
>
> More fonts have been developed during this computer graphics era than
> during the millennia preceding it. So who knows...
And no one, especially a computer, can tell you exactly what makes an
<A> an "A." But the forms ain't changing.
-- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@att.net
- Next message: Simon Johnson: "Re: How secure is 2048 bit RSA?"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: 'Scripts' & Communications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|