Re: ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm
From: John Savard (jsavard_at_excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid)
Date: 04/01/04
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: encryption of social security number"
- In reply to: John Norway: "ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Next in thread: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Reply: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:34:54 GMT
It is certainly true that x^0 = 1 for all x (with the exception of
x=0, for which, mathematically, the result may also be zero, but the
usual convention is to choose 1 in this case as well).
However, the legitimate decryptor faces some ambiguity in his solution
as well.
Happy April.
John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: encryption of social security number"
- In reply to: John Norway: "ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Next in thread: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Reply: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: ANNOUNCE: NIST Considers Schneier Public Key Algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]