Re: RFC-2898 Appendix B
From: Chun (jang.yeop.chun-no-spam_at_reflective-technologies.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: AMcD: "Bad day!"
- Previous message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: Is this secure?"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: RFC-2898 Appendix B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:14:10 -0500 (EST)
Brian Gladman wrote:
> Do you mean RFC 2898?
Yes.
> True. But there are very few security environments in which such a large
> keyspace is not negated by many other factors.
Can you help me to understand these other factors? Are some of them fixed by
using Safeboot Solo or DCPP or SecureDoc? Are you talking about leaking
information into the swap or slack space, leaving unencrypted copies around,
etc?
- Next message: AMcD: "Bad day!"
- Previous message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: Is this secure?"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: RFC-2898 Appendix B"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
