Re: Bruce Schneier, Counter-Terrorism Expert?
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 03/25/04
- Next message: Paul Pires: "Re: XORShift PRNG as a diffusion structure"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Q: Expressiveness of sign-languages"
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Bruce Schneier, Counter-Terrorism Expert?"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Bruce Schneier, Counter-Terrorism Expert?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:10:01 +0100
John A. Malley wrote:
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Sorry, I must ernestly say that I have zero idea of what
>> you are talking above. Extremely sorry!
>
>
> http://www.gotfuturama.com/Information/CharacterBios/bender.dhtml
>
> http://adultswim.toonzone.net/aqua.html
> http://flakmag.com/features/aquateen.html
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/blackadder/epguide/two_money.shtml
I have neither interest and time nor reason to study such
materials for the purpose of the present discussion. Should
I also first study some novels and plays of reknown authors
in order to discuss with you?? Fo you happen to know Occam's
Razor?? It's your job in formal discussions on scientific
topics to formulate your points in clear, plain simple
English, in particular when your partners are not natives.
>> So what's that?? If you want to criticize me, then say that
>> openly, clearly and in very plain words, in an English that
>> is understandable to the 'average' foreigners who have
>> learnt English in schools in their own countries but don't
>> have more knowledge than that in English!!
>
>
> Gosh, "Makes Kinda Sense, doesn't it?" in conjunction with the remainder
> of the post, should have pointed you to the oh-so-cunning steganographic
> message:
>
> Makes Kinda Sense <=> "_M_akes _K_inda _S_ense <=> MKS.
That's a horrible way of writing something for a sci.*
group in my conviction. I would anyway feel ashamed for
ever coming up with the idea of writing in that manner,
if I were you.
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> BTW, may I also in this opportunity once again call
>> your attention to the fact that you haven't yet
>> followed-up on my last post in the other thread that
>> explained my scheme countering chosen-plaintext attacks?
>
>
> *Sigh* "The path of my life is strewn with cowpats from the devil's own
> satanic herd." - Edmund Blackadder the II.
>
> Did you read any of the papers we pointed you to about the concrete
> security of block cipher encryption modes (as encryption schemes) and
> why their concrete security depends on the chosen plaintext security of
> the underlying block cipher?
If you are unable to anwser the two very plain clear-cut
and simply interpretable questions, then this clearly
shows that you couldn't argue because you are wrong in
what you previously wrote in that thread. Any general
readers could readily see that!!
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Paul Pires: "Re: XORShift PRNG as a diffusion structure"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Q: Expressiveness of sign-languages"
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Bruce Schneier, Counter-Terrorism Expert?"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Bruce Schneier, Counter-Terrorism Expert?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|