Re: Unbreakable Encryption ? Scenarios - What encryption method would be best?

From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 03/18/04

  • Next message: Tony: "Cryptanalysis of XOR" 
    Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC)

    Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> writes:

    ]"David Eather" <eather@tpg.com.au> wrote in
    ]news:405929cd@dnews.tpgi.com.au:

    ]>
    ]> "AES and the improved version Camellia" does not say or imply that
    ]> Camellia is an improved version of AES.

    ]Yes, it does.

    ]> It identifies two algorithms

    ]No. If you want to identify two algorithms, write: "AES and the improved
    ]version of Camelia."

    ]> "AES" and the "improved version Camellia" as opposed to the first
    ]> specification of "Camellia". No ancestry is implied or stated.

    ]Yes, there is.

    It is ambiguous. Something is missing-- either the word "of" or a comma.
    The reader must supply it.

  • Next message: Tony: "Cryptanalysis of XOR"

    Relevant Pages
    • Quantcast