Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?
From: Lassi Hippeläinen (lassi.hippelainen_at_welho.compromised.invalid)
Date: 02/28/04
- Next message: beej: "My own little replacement for the Unix crypt"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Sebastian Gottschalk - you have got a virus"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:15:23 +0200
Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
> In http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1538027,00.asp
> with the title 'RSA Panel: Cryptography Can't Foil Human
> Weakness' there is the following:
>
> In perhaps the only actual discussion of cryptography,
> the Weizmann Institute's Shamir said the sun was setting
> on stream ciphers used to encode real-time data streams.
> Instead, the power of today's microprocessors could be
> used to encode data in blocks via block ciphers, which
> are more powerful but require a large amount of
> information to be buffered and then encoded.
I disagree about two of those arguments.
First, whenever processors have gotten faster, the applications have
consumed that speed ("Moore giveth, Gates taketh away"). If there aren't
enough cycles to do block ciphering now, there won'tbe in near future
either. And there are still those low power low bandwidth applications
that have to play by the old rules anyway. So, IMHO there is a market
for stream ciphers also in future.
Secondly, the block size isn't an issue. From the Quality of Service
point of view, the most dificcult application is Voice over IP. VoIP
uses 20 octet packets, and needs low-jitter low-latency QoS. But 20
octets is still more than an AES block!
Stream ciphers are more efficient in terms of bandwidth, because they
don't need padding bits. Anybody interested in developing a 160 bit
block cipher for VoIP?
-- Lassi
> Are stream ciphers really to go away in practice? What are
> the opinions of the group? Aren't there ongoing projects
> of stream cipher designs? (I suppose the issue might
> depend on the 'definition' of stream cipher and block cipher.
> Note that combinations of both types of techniques are
> possible and in fact could be advantageous in my humble view.)
>
> M. K. Shen
> --------------------------------------
> http://home.t-online.de/home/mok-kong.shen
- Next message: beej: "My own little replacement for the Unix crypt"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Sebastian Gottschalk - you have got a virus"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Sun setting on stream ciphers?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|