Re: Encryption key changing the encryption logic.
From: Cesar Bremer Pinheiro (cesarbremer_at_raseac.com.br)
Date: 02/22/04
- Next message: Phil Carmody: "Re: anybody interested in math on Big Numbers"
- Previous message: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: anybody interested in math on Big Numbers"
- In reply to: Nico Mahlo: "Re: Encryption key changing the encryption logic."
- Next in thread: Ulrich Wurst: "Re: Encryption key changing the encryption logic."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Feb 2004 11:53:50 -0800
> Let's make a simple reference implementation:
>
> We have a function generateWonder as follows:
>
> gw: (k,p) -> (c)
>
> k: key for algorithm to use
> p: plaintext to encrypt with algo k
> c: ciphertext
>
Hi Nico
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= =
Thank you for your considerations.
I would like to change your start point, instead using:
gw: (k,p) -> c
You could use:
gw: (k1,k2,p) -> (c)
k1: key for algorithms logic to use
k2: encryption key
p: plaintext to encrypt with algo k
c: ciphertext
Another points of consideration, you can ever made bad architectures
using this aproach, but i am only asking for possible good aproaches
(if they can be done).
One of them could be a strong immutable logic kernel with variable
logic blocks added, or a lot of blocks of strong symmetric encription
to be worked. My idea is not to use simply obfuscation, but to force
the use of a brain in each key to break the cypher text, plus the use
of a computer. The algorithms could be published (without problems), i
was thinking how to increase a lot the number of possible logic
encriptions available in order to make the things harder to break. All
the basic blocks could be immune to the known attacks, or eack block
could be immune to a kind of attack, but we could only mix blocks that
could result in a system immune to the known attacks today used.
We have a lot of possible architectures to be tried, and again, i am
asking for possible good ideas (again, i don't know if this can be
done).
Thank You.
Cesar.
- Next message: Phil Carmody: "Re: anybody interested in math on Big Numbers"
- Previous message: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: anybody interested in math on Big Numbers"
- In reply to: Nico Mahlo: "Re: Encryption key changing the encryption logic."
- Next in thread: Ulrich Wurst: "Re: Encryption key changing the encryption logic."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|