Re: Fast 32-bit Hash
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 02/17/04
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Where to start?"
- Previous message: Mack: "Re: How secure is AES"
- In reply to: John Hadstate: "Fast 32-bit Hash"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: Fast 32-bit Hash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
"John Hadstate" <jh113355@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4f8c0b5.0402170740.53524d13@posting.google.com...
[snip]
>
> Aside from the obvious fact that a 32-bit hash is mostly too short for
> a cryptographic hash, does anyone see any obvious attacks or other
> problems?
>
Is this suitable for checking that a block or entire message has
arrived error free? That is as a replacement for a CRC.
Diagnostic software frequently checks software in prom by
running a sum check, unfortunately unprogrammed chips can
produce a false pass by returning all zeros or all ones. Will
this hash detect these errors?
A nice simple algorithm.
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Where to start?"
- Previous message: Mack: "Re: How secure is AES"
- In reply to: John Hadstate: "Fast 32-bit Hash"
- Next in thread: Cristiano: "Re: Fast 32-bit Hash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|