Re: Is this simple scheme secure?
From: NYC (name_at_company.com)
Date: 01/31/04
- Next message: NYC: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Previous message: n3tdiver_at_yahoo.com: "Help with cypher"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:22:48 +0100
Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <q%zSb.80748$dP1.206618@newsc.telia.net>, Foo Bar wrote:
>
>>>Ok, but that can only be possible for some very specific kinds of secrets
>>>right?
>>
>>It can be used for things like "I know a n-coloring of this graph" or "I
>>know an isomorphism between these two graphs". I don't know the area well
>>enough to comment on the case of more general secrets.
>
>
> All kinds of problems (like, all the NP-complete problems) can be
> transformed into problems that have ZKP procedures, so basically all secrets
> of the form "I have a solution to this instance of this particular
> interesting problem" can be proved using ZKP.
>
> Furthermore, all proofs in ordinary mathematics can (in theory...the graphs
> involved would probably be too large to work with) be transformed into
> Hamiltonian circuits on a graph. That is, there exists a graph, G, for
> example, with the property that the existence of a Hamiltonian circuit on
> that graph would give a proof of, say, the Riemann hypothesis. Prove to the
> world using a non-interactive ZKP that you have that Hamiltonian circuit,
> and you'll have proved that you have proved the Riemann hypothesis, without
> giving away anything about your proof.
>
> I wonder if such a proof would qualify for the Millenium Prize? :-)
>
Really? Does this mean that any proposition can be turned into a
question about a certain graph having a Hamiltonian circuit? Or does it
mean that once you have the proof of some proposition, then you can
create a graph in which the Hamiltonian circuit can be used to see that
the proposition must be true?
- Next message: NYC: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Previous message: n3tdiver_at_yahoo.com: "Help with cypher"
- In reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|