Re: Best secure surfing solution

From: Lawrence Rodis (lrodis_at_strategicresource.com)
Date: 01/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:58:56 GMT

Vanguard,

The original poster asked how hard would it be for his company to monitor
his usage. The answer is very easily.
If I put that software on your system it would capture what you are doing
with Keystrokes and displays captures. No encryption would matter. Could IT
do it in your organization? With proper approval, yes. Would IT review the
data? doubtful. Your boss or some other appropriate party? yes. 

-- 
Regards,
Lawrence A. Rodis
President
Strategic Resource Consulting Group L.L.C.
702-221-6274
lrodis@strategicresource.com
www.strategicresource.com
"*Vanguard*" <no-email@bogus.nix> wrote in message
news:KLadneHypudOzYbd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> "Lawrence Rodis" said in
> news:k2ESb.3993$F23.1146@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> > George,
> >
> > To prevent your ISP, what Flag said is correct.  For your Company,
> > they could have access to everything you do in minutes.  Look at
> > spectorsoft.com and their spector professional edition.  I'm using it
> > on PC for several clients.  And have caught folks doing things they
> > should not.  Best to keep your private stuff off of other peoples
> > PC's.
> >
> >
> >
> > "George" <lgst036@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:f86efd4e.0401301646.3729e776@posting.google.com...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would be grateful if someone could give me some advice.
> >> Not wanting my ISP or employer to see confidential emails and
> >> surfing, I have set up a service with companies providing secure web
> >> browsing (Idzap, the cloak, etc). So my web browser is using https
> >> using certificates from the company offering this service.
> >> I have read about possibilities of intercepting the https with "man
> >> in the middle" or maybe other techniques.
> >> How difficult it is for an ISP or my company&#8217;s network
> >> administrator to do that. Translated in money, how much would they
> >> need to spend to do that.
> >> Are there any better solutions, maybe a VPN service, Kerberos setup
> >> or anything else possible.
> >> Of course the above assumes that the secure service provider is
> >> trusted on which I would be keen to find any of their commonly known
> >> policies. (maybe suggestions)
> >>
> >> Many thanks
> >>
> >> George
>
> But since the connection is SSL secured, why would the user care that you
> could sniff out their encrypted HTTP datastream?  It'll look like a bunch
of
> garbage to you, the sniffer.  You can still see *where* they are
navigating
> but you cannot see *what* they are sending and receiving.
>
> The only way that spectorsoft.com could be determining what the user is
> sending (but not what they are receiving) is to install a client on that
> user's computer.  That is, the product would have to install a keylogger.
> That appears to be what the product does since it states, "..., Spector
Pro
> contains seven integrated tools that record: ..., keystrokes typed, ...".
>
> You had better make sure that you have permission from each department to
do
> this sniffing and keylogging.  Our department, for example, sometimes has
> highly sensitive data between us and a partner that no one else in the
> company should see (and anyone else seeing the data is a severe breach in
> security).  We even have to be in a separate section of the building, all
> papers must be discarded in our wastebaskets and not outside our locked
room
> (because it gets handled separately and securely from the other trash),
> recording devices are definitely taboo, and so on.  If we caught anyone in
> IS or elsewhere in our company sniffing our communications, even if they
> were encrypted, they'd get laid off or, at least, suspended.  Just like
> there are laws prohibited unauthorized wire tapping, there are always
> internal policies and politics that dictate if anyone can go sniffing just
> because they are curious.  You need to establish well written and
understood
> policies and make sure all departments are educated (and you, too, about
> what you are NOT allowed to do regarding communications from some
> departments).
>
> As far as the keylogger client, that wouldn't survive very long on my
hosts.
> By going through an intermediary but external anonymizer service using
SSL,
> all you could see is that I was connecting to that service but not where I
> was actually connecting to past that service.  If e-mails are sensitive
then
> the sender should be using encryption.  You can see in your mail server
logs
> (and don't need SpectorSoft) where the e-mail went but not its content.
Of
> course, if anyone from IS installed anything on our alpha lab hosts, they
> would get their ass royally kicked for corrupting our known configurations
> used for testing.
>
>
> -- 
> ____________________________________________________________
> *** Post replies to newsgroup.  E-mail is not accepted. ***
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Best secure surfing solution
    ... I have set up a service with companies providing secure web ... the product would have to install a keylogger. ... If we caught anyone in> IS or elsewhere in our company sniffing our communications, even if they> were encrypted, they'd get laid off or, at least, suspended. ... If e-mails are sensitive then> the sender should be using encryption. ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: Unbreakable Encryption ? Scenarios - What encryption method would be best?
    ... DES is a well-known algorithm so there are good reasons to have a good ... > risk it by storing one of the best possible passwords (or encryption ... > Ok lets say there will be a secure channel but it will happen only ... > because the decrypting method yielded a plain text message and vice ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk]
    ... > access to the mail server's private keys and thus the monitor can follow the ... > in a way that's more secure rather than less secure. ... for service level encryption versus VPN access. ... >> reducing bugs reduces the number of sever bugs. ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Symmetric encryption algorithm with group like properties
    ... >> Solutions that exist today are not as secure as they can be. ... I wouldn't expect more than PGP / GPG type encryption, ... > versions - with the key, protected by RSA encryption under a RSA public key ... > Alice needs a secure decryption mechanism to read her emails, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Best secure surfing solution
    ... > To prevent your ISP, ... I have set up a service with companies providing secure web ... IS or elsewhere in our company sniffing our communications, ...
    (sci.crypt)