Re: question
From: Gregory G Rose (ggr_at_qualcomm.com)
Date: 01/30/04
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: FFT test with few kbits"
- In reply to: Necrotica: "Re: question"
- Next in thread: Jack: "Re: question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Jan 2004 14:03:04 -0800
In article <401a51ee$0$29131$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
Necrotica <aclements@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>so let me see if i understand what you are saying... instead of having a 64
>bit encryption as i had hoped for i actually have a 40 bit encryption?? im
>trying to make the character frequency as little as possible
Yup. And you've had no effect on the character
frequency issue at all.
Greg.
-- Greg Rose 232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C Qualcomm Australia: http://www.qualcomm.com.au
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Is this simple scheme secure?"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: FFT test with few kbits"
- In reply to: Necrotica: "Re: question"
- Next in thread: Jack: "Re: question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading