Re: FFT test with few kbits

From: Cristiano (cristiano.pi_at_NSquipo.it)
Date: 01/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:05:51 GMT

"Paul Pires" <diodude@got.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:IDxSb.19701$uf3.14864@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com
> Cristiano <cristiano.pi@NSquipo.it> wrote in message
> news:1qsSb.224058$_P.7639620@news4.tin.it...
>>> Don't you mean that "Many good PRNG's pass the test (more often)
>>> than many (known) bad generators do"
>>>
>>> Any "perfect" PRNG *could* fail any given run (or set of runs) of
>>> any good test.
>>> A purely random stream *could* fail any single run (or set of runs)
>>> of any good test.
>>
>> C'mon Paul, you perfectly know that I meant what you said. :-)
>
> Yes, I guessed that was what you meant. I didn't want others to think
> you were claiming a magic oracle and start harrasing you for it.
> Call it a preimptive question :-)

Oh! You're so kind! :-)

Thank you
Cristiano