Re: Specific encryption
From: Benjamin Choi (nospam_at_technosoft21.com)
Date: 01/26/04
- Next message: Mack: "Re: issues with statistical test suite from http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/"
- Previous message: JT: "Re: Hmmm"
- In reply to: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Next in thread: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Jan 2004 23:38:51 -0800
Richard Heathfield <invalid@address.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message news:<4014358d@news2.power.net.uk>...
> paaro wrote:
>
> > My question is:
> > is there an algorithm, which would encyrpt the given string in such
> > manner, that when we would add some chars at the end (or maybe just
> > alter some chars at the end of encrypted string) and then would
> > decrypt it, that we would get something completely different out of
> > it. Not that just the end of the string would be slightly different,
> > but the whole decrypted string would be completely messy and different
> > from the original.
>
> My own CDX-2 algorithm will do this. Note that CDX-2 has had very little
> analysis done on it, and those who have looked at it have not been
> impressed (although no actual crack has yet been published). Nevertheless,
> it does have the property you seek:
Not if you apply it to a long message though. CDX-2 diffusion is
constant and quite poor applied to long messages with short keys.
-- Benjamin Choi
- Next message: Mack: "Re: issues with statistical test suite from http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/"
- Previous message: JT: "Re: Hmmm"
- In reply to: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Next in thread: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: Specific encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|