Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers.
From: Mark Shelor (mshelor_at_comcast.removeme.net)
Date: 01/24/04
- Next message: John E. Hadstate: "Re: TTM broken or not?"
- Previous message: Mack: "Re: issues with statistical test suite from http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 04:46:06 -0700
Tom St Denis wrote:
> Mark Shelor <mshelor@comcast.removeme.net> wrote in message news:<NtidnT2tRYXo_4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>...
>
>>Tom St Denis wrote:
>>
>>>It should also be "long" not "int"... ;-) Oh J-L when will ya learn....
>>>hehehehehe
>>
>>Absolutely brilliant observations, gentlemen. They really speak to the
>>heart of the matter.
>
> Who asked you? No really I want to know?
Your second sentence is a declarative or exclamatory statement, Tom, not
an interrogative. It should end with a period or an exclamation mark,
not a question mark. Oh TSD when will ya learn ...
Cordially, Mark
- Next message: John E. Hadstate: "Re: TTM broken or not?"
- Previous message: Mack: "Re: issues with statistical test suite from http://csrc.nist.gov/rng/"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Trying to generate MD5 'magic' numbers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
