Re: Symmetric Keys / Hash Algorithm / Discret Log

From: Adham Sabry (adhamsabry_at_gawab.com)
Date: 01/20/04

  • Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Looking for One Time Pad Software, small with gui for WIN." 
    Date: 19 Jan 2004 19:27:04 -0800

    "John E. Hadstate" <jh113355@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<jSPOb.34300$R85.17022@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
    > "Adham Sabry" <adhamsabry@gawab.com> wrote in message
    > news:f7d196bb.0401182313.35af6d9c@posting.google.com...
    > > "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@iahu.ca> wrote in message
    > news:<E3vOb.18450$nl2.15532@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>...
    > > >
    > > > Cuz it makes sense? No point in using a 256-bit AES key if I can forge
    > > > packets in less than 2^256 time, etc.
    > >
    > > This means that AES 256 bits is simply insecure.
    > >
    >
    > What is your basis for this conclusion?

    I am not saying AES 256 is not secure, I m just saying IF i got able t
    develop an attack and this attack can be parcitcally implemented
    against any cipher of anykey length hence this cipher is insecure. I
    was just try to deduce what behind the lines.

  • Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Looking for One Time Pad Software, small with gui for WIN."

    Relevant Pages
    Loading