Re: ANNOUNCE: SHA-224 in Digest::SHA
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Q: Fast computation of parity"
- Previous message: ScottD: "Re: Fast computation of parity"
- In reply to: Mark Shelor: "Re: ANNOUNCE: SHA-224 in Digest::SHA"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: ANNOUNCE: SHA-224 in Digest::SHA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:11:58 GMT
"Mark Shelor" <mshelor@comcast.removeme.net> wrote in message
news:k_SdnRzMe46T4G-iRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> > No it makes sense to specify the protocol on the bit level. So if you
> > really NEED it you can use it.
>
>
> So then, you're disagreeing with the earlier poster who would want to
> disallow (or did he instead rather ambiguously say "bother to allow"?)
> bit-level digest computations on a PC? Not that it matters, I suppose,
> since neither you nor he nor I set the standards for these things. The
> real question is whether you're producing an implementation that allows
> all capabilities specified by the standard, or just making rather
> dubious excuses for not having done so.
They're not dubious excuses. But since you won't at least hold this
disussion with a modicum of civility I'll just say
I don't care. write your code how you write your code.
Tom
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Q: Fast computation of parity"
- Previous message: ScottD: "Re: Fast computation of parity"
- In reply to: Mark Shelor: "Re: ANNOUNCE: SHA-224 in Digest::SHA"
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: ANNOUNCE: SHA-224 in Digest::SHA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|