Re: Idea for algo.
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: Delivering on talk"
- Previous message: Peter: "Idea for algo."
- In reply to: Peter: "Idea for algo."
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: Idea for algo."
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: Idea for algo."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:57:05 GMT
"Peter" <peter_rabbit@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:MQqIb.872695$pl3.250677@pd7tw3no...
> Any serious thoughts? Has something like this been done before?
No and here's why. You have to shuffle after every byte you process. And
how do you shuffle? You need some random bits [or pseudo]. So you might as
well make better use of your PRNG.
I'd say study some cryptanalysis... don't make your own designs...
Tom
- Next message: Jean-Luc Cooke: "Re: Delivering on talk"
- Previous message: Peter: "Idea for algo."
- In reply to: Peter: "Idea for algo."
- Next in thread: John Savard: "Re: Idea for algo."
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: Idea for algo."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|