Re: Back Doors
From: Foo Bar (foobar965_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/20/03
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: ECB 1.0 beta 1"
- In reply to: mike3: "Back Doors"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: Back Doors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:21:15 GMT
mike4ty4@yahoo.com (mike3) writes:
> Hi.
>
> How can one implement "back doors" in an encryption algorithm that
> would allow someone to decode all messages encrypted with it provided
> they know some secret "magic" formula? Is this a very diffcult problem
> or an easy one?
Depends on what the requirements are on the trapdoor. For example, how
hard should it be to detect? Rijmen and Preneel suggested one way of
designing hard-to-detect trapdoors into a cipher in "A family of
trapdoor ciphers" (FSE'97) [1], but that proposal was broken by Wu, Bao,
Deng and Ye in "Cryptanalysis on Rijmen-Preneel Trapdoor Ciphers"
(Asiacrypt '98) [2].
Note that a block cipher with a trapdoor that is hard to detect but easy
to use can be used for public key encryption.
Perhaps the Weis and Lucks paper "'All your key bit are belong to us'
the truth about black box cryptography" [3] contains something
interesting.
[1] http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~cosicart/ps/VR-9703.ps.gz
[2] http://icsd.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/publications/WuHongjun_1998_trapdoor.pdf
[3] http://www.nluug.nl/events/sane2002/papers/WeisLucksAllYourKeybit.ps
/FB
-- Foo Bar (foobar965@hotmail.com)
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: ECB 1.0 beta 1"
- In reply to: mike3: "Back Doors"
- Next in thread: John A. Malley: "Re: Back Doors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]