Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE
From: David A. Scott (daVvid_a_scott_at_email.com)
Date: 12/05/03
- Next message: David A. Scott: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Previous message: Mimic: "Re: The following firms I consider so called communistic firms ... they have recently received some governmental subsidies from the government of Finland .."
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 5 Dec 2003 21:01:58 GMT
daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) wrote in
news:bqqpde$17tk$2@agate.berkeley.edu:
>
> Unfortunately, I have yet to see anyone articulate a reasonable
> alternative that does not rely on computational difficulty, so for
> better or worse, we seem to be stuck with computational security (at
> least for now).
>
>
True if you choose to close your eyes it makes it difficult
to see other points of view. However most of the little add ons
seem to be done on purpose to make them nonbijective. Look at
the NIST simple bijective padding which I suggested using. If was
based on why add information to crypto if it can only hurt. Yet
you and others continue strongly to argue that who cares if its
slightly better since you are putting all your hopes on complexity
and purposely leaving the other hooks in to make the break easier
if complexity fails.
David A. Scott
-- My Crypto code http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott19u.zip http://cryptography.org/cgi-bin/crypto.cgi/Misc/scott16u.zip http://www.jim.com/jamesd/Kong/scott19u.zip old version My Compression code http://bijective.dogma.net/ **TO EMAIL ME drop the roman "five" ** Disclaimer:I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged. As a famous person once said "any cryptograhic system is only as strong as its weakest link"
- Next message: David A. Scott: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Previous message: Mimic: "Re: The following firms I consider so called communistic firms ... they have recently received some governmental subsidies from the government of Finland .."
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Compression and UNICITY DISTANCE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
