Re: The Pain of Cryptography
From: Anton Stiglic (stiglic_at_cs.mcgill.ca)
Date: 12/04/03
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: What 'NSA'?"
- Previous message: Kai: "IP Level Encryption"
- In reply to: Roger Schlafly: "Re: The Pain of Cryptography"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: The Pain of Cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:47:16 -0800
"Roger Schlafly" <rogersc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:LNrzb.2107$F17.348203096@twister1.starband.net...
> "Anton Stiglic" <stiglic@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote
> > Maybe David Wagner suffers from split personality! Note that his last
> > post appears to come from the domain taverner.cs.berkeley.edu,
>
> You are reading a lot into this. Obviously David was paid a fixed
> amount of money to spend a limited number of hours doing an
> analysis, and write a report. He chose to spend that time doing
> some standard attacks, and seeing if they work. There is nothing
> wrong with his report.
Of course I was just kidding. I agree that there is nothing wrong
with his report, except maybe the fact that he did not comment on
the unusual long key length.
In fact, even if the cipher got broken, I still find his report
instructive. It demonstrates a nice systematic approach to quickly
verifying the security of a stream cipher against basic known
attacks.
>Sometimes someone finds a clever attack that someone else overlooks.
>That's life in the crypto biz. If there is a lesson here, I'd say that
>companies should hire more than one cryptologist to do analyses.
That might help or it might not. I did not read the paper describing the
attack, but if the company hired several cryptologists working separately,
and all had limited time, they might all take the same approach as
David and not stumble upon the vulnerability. I think the lesson is that
you really need a long enough time period for the analysis, so that
cryptanalysts can think of uncommon ways to attack the cipher.
--Anton
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: What 'NSA'?"
- Previous message: Kai: "IP Level Encryption"
- In reply to: Roger Schlafly: "Re: The Pain of Cryptography"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: The Pain of Cryptography"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|