Re: Addition to SHS...?
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 12/03/03
- Next message: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Previous message: Kim Hyldgaard: "Addition to SHS...?"
- In reply to: Kim Hyldgaard: "Addition to SHS...?"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:06:23 GMT
"Kim Hyldgaard" <kim.hyldgaard@dxd.ericsson.se> wrote
> What the reason for specifying a 224? - Obviously one could think of
> computation speed, but since it's based on 256?
It is an odd announcement. There is an official NIST elliptic curve of
that size, but there are other sizes as well, and usually truncation is
necessary.
- Next message: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Previous message: Kim Hyldgaard: "Addition to SHS...?"
- In reply to: Kim Hyldgaard: "Addition to SHS...?"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Addition to SHS...?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
