Re: Good enough for crypto?
From: Paul Crowley (paul_at_JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org)
Date: 11/26/03
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Security of Oyster Cards"
- Previous message: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- In reply to: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Next in thread: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Reply: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 26 Nov 2003 08:14:40 +0000
swilber@comscire.com (Scott Wilber) writes:
> I find it quite boring when someone posts a response merely for the
> purpose of attacking. This may be entertaining for them, but it is
> just a waste of time for most people. I will attempt to make a
> reasonable reply anyway.
This is very enlightening. I've wondered for a while whether the
ComScire generators were good, but haven't had time to do a detailed
investigation. Fortunately the way the manufacturers respond to
expert technical criticism is the best determiner there is of snake
oil.
Clue: When someone like GGR criticises you, you start by thanking him
for taking the time to examine your design.
-- __ Paul Crowley \/ o\ sig@paul.ciphergoth.org /\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/
- Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Security of Oyster Cards"
- Previous message: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- In reply to: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Next in thread: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Reply: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]