Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 11/26/03
- Next message: Randy Howard: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- In reply to: Jon Malm: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:50:30 GMT
"Jon Malm" <sc@imalm.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, what does Certicom have patents on? What
> obscure tricks are you talking about?
The Certicom patents mainly involve elliptic curves using normal
bases over non-prime fields. Most people would rather use prime
fields, because the non-prime fields have various security problems.
Even if you want to use the non-prime fields, the polynomial bases
are more efficient than the normal bases. There is no good reason
to use what Certicom has patented.
- Next message: Randy Howard: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: sci.crypt sandbox"
- In reply to: Jon Malm: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: Are all parts of ECC royalty free?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|