Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption
From: David Wagner (daw_at_taverner.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 11/25/03
- Next message: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Previous message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: doubts about rc4"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:07:17 +0000 (UTC)
Andrew Swallow wrote:
>Time travel brakes the laws of the conservation of energy
>and momentum. A moving chunk of mass/energy disappears
>from the present and appears in the past of future. If the
>item goes into the past the same matter appears twice.
No, not necessarily. You've got some reading to do.
Keyword: "reverse causality".
This is off-topic. Can you take it elsewhere, please?
- Next message: Scott Wilber: "Re: Good enough for crypto?"
- Previous message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: doubts about rc4"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Next in thread: Mxsmanic: "Re: Qauntum Computers and brute forcing encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
